Tratamiento Laser-Lok® en implantes dentales. A propósito de un caso clínico / Laser-Lok® treatment on implants dental. About a clinical case

Uno de los retos más importantes, hoy en día, en implantología oral es evitar la pèrdida ósea alrededor de los implantes oseointegrados y funcionales con el paso del tiempo. Una de las superficies que se ha desarrollado en los últimos años es la resultante de la microtexturación mediante láser. Diversos estudios han demostrado la adhesión del tejido conectivo a las superficies tratadas con láser en la zona cervical de los implantes oseointegrados, consiguiendo de este modo un sellado biológico a este nivel. Revisamos lo publicado sobre este tema y presentamos un caso clínico de inserción de un implante unitario con tratamiento láser en su zona cervical desde su colocación hasta la restauración final, donde se observa la buena integración de los tejidos y el èxito del caso a largo plazo. (AU)

There are certainly situations where the standard implants can not be placed or suppose a risk for the crestal bone maintenance. The narrow implants have been used for a wide variety of indications, stablishing scientifically-based treatment protocols with excellent long-term results.In the present study we present a narrative review of narrow implants highlighting their indications and limitations, and a case report where narrow implants have been sh it is evident that narrow implants are an alternative when rehabilitate edentulous spaces with low available bone in the horizontal direction or reduced mesio-distal spaces in aesthetic areas. (AU)

Histological differences in the adherence of connective tissue to laser-treated abutments and standard abutments for dental implants. An experimental pilot study in humans.

BACKGROUND: The goal of the current study is to assess the difference in connective tissue adherence to laser microtextured versus machined titanium abutments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six patients were selected and each of them received 2 implants, one combined with a laser treated abutment and one with a machined abutment. After three months, the abutments were retrieved together with their surrounding gingival tissue for histological analysis. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of microscopical images was performed to assess the presence or absence of adherence between the soft tissues and the abutment, and the percentage of soft tissue adhered to the two different surfaces. RESULTS: Intimate adherence between connective tissue and the laser treated abutments, while on machined abutments no adherence was detected. A significant difference was found in the percentage of surface in contact with soft tissue between both implant abutments p=0.03. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitation of the current study, it can be concluded that connective tissues show enhanced adherence to microtextured abutments compared to machined abutments.